JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 5, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Aquiles Arrieta Gómez

✓Claimant Procurador General De La Nacion

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica
  • Procede únicamente respecto del auto que rechaza la admisión de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica presentado por el Procurador General de la Nación en contra del auto mediante el cual se dispuso informar al peticionario que la solicitud de nulidad procesal e improrrogabilidad de la competencia presentada sería examinada por la Sala Plena de la Corporación, en la oportunidad procesal correspondiente.

Luego de precisar que el recurso de súplica no procede contra el auto que admite la demanda de constitucionalidad sino contra el auto de rechazo de la misma y, que la nulidad interpuesta frente a un asunto que no sea de trámite, como es la competencia, puede ser resuelta en la sentencia.

Se RECHAZA, por improcedente, el recurso presentado por el Jefe del Ministerio Público.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por IMPROCEDENTE el recurso de suplica presentado por el Procurador General de la Nacion el veinticinco (25) de mayo de dos mil dieciseis (2016).
  2. SEGUNDO. NO DECLARAR LA NULIDAD del auto proferido el diecinueve (19) de mayo de dos mil dieciseis (2016) dentro del expediente D - 11329.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Aquiles Arrieta Gómez
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Magistrado
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
Magistrado
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Presidente
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.